The Pawns Hate Each Other, But the Players Are Friends

In every society, whether in politics, business, or even daily social structures, there exists a recurring pattern: those at the bottom often find themselves in conflict, while those at the top, who pull the strings, tend to share alliances. This paradox is well illustrated by the saying, “the pawns always hate each other, but the players are friends.”

The nature of pawns

In the game of chess, pawns are the most numerous pieces on the board. They are seen as expendable, pushed forward to protect more valuable pieces or to create strategic openings. In the metaphorical sense, pawns represent the common people, workers, or those without significant influence. Their lives are spent in competition for limited resources, jobs, recognition, opportunities, and survival. Because of this scarcity, pawns often clash with one another, failing to see that their struggles are being shaped and directed by those who control the game.

The players behind the board

The individuals who play chess: the ones making the moves, are often friends, colleagues, or at least respectful adversaries. In politics, opposing leaders may publicly spar, but behind closed doors they often dine together, strike deals, and protect shared interests. In business, rival CEOs might compete fiercely in the marketplace, yet still belong to the same elite circles, attending the same conferences and enjoying mutual respect.

The irony is that while the pawns believe they are fighting personal battles, the real contest is happening at a higher level, often with far less hostility. The players may differ in objectives, but they usually understand each other’s strategies, play by agreed rules, and maintain a level of civility unseen among the pawns.

As a matter of fact, this is not even a secret. So it’s not like I am revealing anything that isn’t already known. The real question is, what can you do about it?

  • Recognize the Game: Many conflicts among ordinary people are manufactured or exaggerated to keep attention away from systemic issues.
  • Build Unity Among the Powerless Individuals: If ordinary people stopped fighting each other, they could transform the balance of power into the kind that serves them, and not only the powerful.
  • Question the Players: Instead of resenting the ordinary individuals, examine the bigger picture. It is wiser to ask who benefits from the divisions and who is really controlling the moves.

This is more than an observation, it is a mirror of society. It reminds us that enmity among the powerless often serves the interests of the powerful. The real challenge lies not in fighting one another, but in understanding the game being played.

©️Victor E. Ojei, 2025.

13 thoughts on “The Pawns Hate Each Other, But the Players Are Friends

  1. True, true. I just listened to a series of lectures about the wars that devastated Europe over the past few centuries and not only were the opposing rulers friends they were in many cases members of the same family. What a sick joke.

    Liked by 2 people

    • It’s a force that preys on emotion, it’s psychological.
      To the higher ups it’s a game, while to the rest of the people, it’s a life or death situation, but keeps losing because they are looking in the wrong direction, and not the players.

      Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.